The Overfed Soul - A Tale of a Dog and a Divided World
- Prashanth

- Feb 6, 2023
- 4 min read
Updated: May 4

It started with a simple act at home, one that unraveled into a deeper reflection on life, power, and the burdens we place on those who cannot speak back. My dog—a scruffy, loyal companion—had been eating his usual portions of Pedigree from a container that was nearing its end. The stock was low, just a little more than his regular meal, and we were due to refill it soon. But my wife, practical as she is, saw an opportunity. She wanted to empty the container completely, give it a good scrub, and start fresh. So, she poured every last crumb into his bowl and nudged him to eat it all.
I watched, uneasy. It was more than he could handle—more than his little stomach was used to. But he’s a dog, trusting and obedient, and he ate because that’s what was asked of him. Later, as I suspected, he suffered. Indigestion set in, his whimpers a quiet protest against a meal forced upon him not for his good, but for our convenience. My wife didn’t mean harm; she just didn’t want the hassle of dealing with leftovers. Yet, in that moment, I saw something bigger—a metaphor for how the powerful often treat the powerless, not out of malice, but out of indifference to their limits.
My dog became a mirror for the poor, the voiceless, the ones who eat what’s shoveled onto their plates because they have no choice. My wife, unwittingly, played the role of authority—well-intentioned perhaps, but blind to the cost of her actions. And as I sat with this thought, I couldn’t help but see parallels in the world around us, especially in places like India and beyond, where inequality tightens its grip and forces the vulnerable to swallow more than they can bear.
The Overburdened in India
In India, this dynamic plays out starkly. Take the story of the street vendors in Mumbai during the 2020 lockdown. When the pandemic hit, the government imposed strict rules to curb the virus—necessary, yes, but often enforced without considering the millions who survive day-to-day. Vendors, already struggling, were told to stay home, their carts confiscated if they dared step out. Meanwhile, the wealthy ordered groceries online, their pantries stocked by delivery workers who risked their lives for meager wages. The poor were force-fed a bitter reality: comply or starve. No one asked if their stomachs—literal or metaphorical—could handle the strain.
Or consider the farmers in Punjab and Haryana, who’ve long protested against agricultural reforms they say favor corporations over small landholders. For decades, they’ve been pushed to produce more, borrow more, and sell at prices dictated by those higher up the chain. When they raised their voices in 2021, marching to Delhi, they were met with barricades and tear gas. The system wanted its container cleaned—its profits secured—and the farmers, like my dog, were expected to swallow the excess, even if it choked them.
A Global Echo
This isn’t unique to India. In the United States, think of the fast-food workers during the same pandemic. While offices emptied and white-collar employees Zoomed from home, these “essential workers”—often immigrants or low-income earners—were fed a double portion: work through the risk, keep the economy humming, and do it for minimum wage. They had no say, no buffer, just a plate piled high with expectation while others stayed safe and comfortable.
In Brazil, the deforestation of the Amazon tells a similar tale. Indigenous communities, who’ve lived sustainably for generations, watch their lands razed to feed the world’s appetite for beef and soy. The global market—our collective “wife” in this story—wants its container emptied, its profits maximized. The cost? The indigestion of displaced tribes, dying ecosystems, and a planet groaning under the weight.
The Weight of Convenience
What ties these stories together is convenience—not always cruelty, but a careless kind of selfishness. My wife didn’t want to hurt our dog; she just wanted a clean slate. But that choice came at his expense. So it is with the powerful—governments, corporations, or even us as individuals. We force-feed the poor, the marginalized, the silent, because it’s easier for us. We clear our conscience, our ledgers, our landscapes, and leave them to digest the consequences.
Our dog recovered, thankfully. A day of rest, some water, and he was back to his wagging self. But the poor—whether in Mumbai’s slums, Punjab’s fields, or the Amazon’s shrinking forests—don’t always get that chance. Their indigestion festers into hunger, debt, displacement, and despair. And unlike my dog, they can’t whimper to us for help. Their voices are too often drowned out by the clatter of our own lives.
A Plea for Balance
So what do we do? Maybe it starts small, like it did for me—speaking up when the bowl’s too full, questioning why it needs to be emptied right now. It’s about seeing the limits of those we hold power over, whether a pet or a people. In India, it could mean policies that don’t just chase GDP but ask who’s bearing the weight. Globally, it’s rejecting a system that overfeeds some while starving others, all to keep the container of progress sparkling clean.
My dog taught me this: love isn’t just feeding someone; it’s knowing when to stop. If we could learn that lesson—really learn it—maybe the world wouldn’t feel so heavy for those who can’t push the plate away.
